Submissions

Articles

Author Guidelines

Aecyon Management Business Innovation Studies (AMBIS) is an open access, peer-reviewed scholarly journal published by Aecyon Publishing. The journal provides a platform for academics, researchers, practitioners, and students to publish high-quality papers in the areas of management, business, entrepreneurship, digital innovation, and strategic leadership.

AMBIS Journal invites researchers, academics, and practitioners to submit their innovative manuscripts. To ensure a smooth publication process, please follow our author guidelines carefully :

1. Article Types: Original research articles, case studies, literature reviews, and conceptual articles.
2. Format: Manuscripts must be prepared in Microsoft Word format, using the template provided (download the template here [link to template]).
3. Manuscript Length : 5,000–8,000 words, including abstract, references, and appendices.
4. Abstract: Maximum 200 words, accompanied by 3–5 keywords.
5. References : IEEE citation style.
6. Figures & Tables : Clear, high resolution, and numbered sequentially.

Full details regarding article structure, writing, and references can be found on the Complete Author Guidelines page.

INTRODUCTION
Introduction should be formatted in Garamond 12 font with 1.15 line spacing. 
Your purpose statement serves as an excellent inception point. The introduction ought to delineate the objectives of your manuscript, as well as elucidate the significance of the subject matter and its contributions to the existing corpus of knowledge. 
Additionally, it is imperative to furnish background information pertinent to the research endeavor, underscore the organizational framework of the paper, and articulate the rationale behind your decision to investigate this particular subject or compose the article. 
What constitutes an optimal word count for an introduction? 
This will be contingent upon the overall length of your manuscript, the academic discipline in which you are engaged, and the journal to which you intend to submit your work. In general, it is advisable to maintain brevity ensuring that the introduction does not encumber the remainder of your paper is crucial. Concurrently, it is essential to provide the reader with sufficient context to comprehend the significance of the research after all, this section represents your chance to persuade them to continue reading.

METHODS
Methods should be formatted in Garamond 12 font with 1.15 line spacing.

The emphasis should be placed on articulating the principal narrative, delineating the key phases of your investigation, the methodologies employed, the influences that shaped your approach, and the rationale behind the selection of specific samples, among other aspects. Supplementary information, including previously documented procedures, may be presented in appendices.

In the event that empirical research has been conducted, it is imperative to articulate your methodology with clarity and under a distinct heading. Providing comprehensive detail is crucial—other researchers should possess the capability to replicate the experiment. In instances where the research is computational or theoretical, it is necessary to incorporate the code, computational methods, or analytical techniques utilized.

Furthermore, it is essential to enumerate the equipment and materials employed in the experiments, along with their sources, particularly if there exists a potential risk that the quality of the utilized items may fluctuate.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Result and Discussion font Garamond 12 with 1.15 spacing

In alignment with the methodology, it is imperative to concentrate on the fundamental aspects, the principal facts, and those possessing broader implications. It is unnecessary to delve into exhaustive detail regarding each statistic presented in your results.

Moreover, the narrative should be structured in a manner that articulates the findings in the most coherent sequence. What are the truly consequential facts that surface? For instance, results that enhance comprehension within the discipline, those that contrast with antecedent findings, and any unforeseen outcomes.

It may be advantageous to exhibit pivotal facts in tabular or graphical formats or to utilize imagery to elucidate your findings. Refer to the Author Guidelines of your selected journal for directives on the appropriate formatting, utilization, and presentation of these elements. This segment concerning results may encompass a discourse on the significance of the findings.

Should you choose to provide unrestricted access to the analytical code and data that underpin your findings, it is advisable to do so.

CONCLUSION
Conclusion font Garamond 12 with 1.15 spacing

The concluding section ought to encapsulate the predominant status quo at the time of writing while contemplating prospective courses of action. The following guidelines delineate the essential practices to adhere to and those to eschew:

Do:

Articulate a summary and conclusion, reiterating the principal argument, and delineating primary conclusions and recommendations.

Elucidate the applicability of your findings or novel framework in practical contexts.

Clarify the ramifications for future research endeavors.

Indicate the degree to which your initial inquiries have been satisfactorily addressed.

Emphasize the constraints inherent within your research.

Don't:

Commence a new topic or introduce extraneous material.

Rehash the introductory remarks.

Articulate self-evident statements.

Contradict any assertions made previously.

A majority of journal editors and reviewers exhibit a preference for a statement regarding the implications for practitioners; thus, this should be incorporated whenever feasible. Each research manuscript ought to elucidate the significance of the findings for the academic community.

REFERENCES
References style is IEEE.
Minimum references are 20 references with 80% must from journals, especially from international reputable journals